Anyone give Staples a chance? I see them definitely winning 5 matches with 2-3 toss ups...
Thoughts...
7 comments
0
mophie
Feb 5, 2020
Well I predicted 7 wins for Warde v Danbury and they got 3 so I'm probably not qualified to give an opinion here :)
Run.the.Pipes
Feb 5, 2020 · Edited: Feb 5, 2020
@mophie I was feeling the same way about this post, but I’ll still give this dual a little breakdown. In regard to our Danbury predictions, (I had it at 8-6 agiast Warde) I guess we just haven’t been giving the Hatters enough credit? or were we to high on Simsbury and Warde?
The first thing that comes to mind for me in this dual is that Warde was able to handle Trumbull with ease, and Trumbull picked up a win over Staples. With that being said, I still think Staples can keep it closer than Trumbull did.
Warde 37 - Staples 19
106 – Warde (toss up)
113 – Warde -Bonus
120 – Staples -Bonus
126 – Staples (toss up)
132 – Warde (Bonus)
138 – Warde
145 – Warde - Bonus
152 – Warde - Bonus
160 – Staples
170 – Warde
182 – Warde (toss up)
195 – Staples
220 – Warde (toss up)
285 – Staples - Bonus
sweep the leg!
Feb 5, 2020
@Run.the.Pipes seems pretty spot on to me. I was more at like 39-17 but all go the same way imo.
realdeal
Feb 5, 2020
I was thinking:
106 Staples
113 Warde Bonus
120 Staples Bonus
126 Staples in a Toss up
132 Warde
138 Staples
145 Warde Bonus
152 Warde Bonus
160 Staples
170 Warde Bonus
182 Warde
195 Staples Bonus
220 Toss up
HWT Staples Bonus
Warde 32 Staples 31 (No clue on 220 - could determine the match...)
sweep the leg!
Feb 5, 2020
No way it’s that close. I say Warde by 20+
stallwarning
Feb 6, 2020
45-25...agree with sweep the leg.
sweep the leg!
Feb 6, 2020
53-18 warde! I said 20+ didn’t realize I could have said 30+ lol
Well I predicted 7 wins for Warde v Danbury and they got 3 so I'm probably not qualified to give an opinion here :)
@mophie I was feeling the same way about this post, but I’ll still give this dual a little breakdown. In regard to our Danbury predictions, (I had it at 8-6 agiast Warde) I guess we just haven’t been giving the Hatters enough credit? or were we to high on Simsbury and Warde?
The first thing that comes to mind for me in this dual is that Warde was able to handle Trumbull with ease, and Trumbull picked up a win over Staples. With that being said, I still think Staples can keep it closer than Trumbull did.
Warde 37 - Staples 19
106 – Warde (toss up)
113 – Warde -Bonus
120 – Staples -Bonus
126 – Staples (toss up)
132 – Warde (Bonus)
138 – Warde
145 – Warde - Bonus
152 – Warde - Bonus
160 – Staples
170 – Warde
182 – Warde (toss up)
195 – Staples
220 – Warde (toss up)
285 – Staples - Bonus
@Run.the.Pipes seems pretty spot on to me. I was more at like 39-17 but all go the same way imo.
I was thinking:
106 Staples
113 Warde Bonus
120 Staples Bonus
126 Staples in a Toss up
132 Warde
138 Staples
145 Warde Bonus
152 Warde Bonus
160 Staples
170 Warde Bonus
182 Warde
195 Staples Bonus
220 Toss up
HWT Staples Bonus
Warde 32 Staples 31 (No clue on 220 - could determine the match...)
No way it’s that close. I say Warde by 20+
45-25...agree with sweep the leg.
53-18 warde! I said 20+ didn’t realize I could have said 30+ lol